Jan Choinski vs Theo Papamalamis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Jun at 01:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Choinski vs T. Papamalamis

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Choinski 1 - 0 Papamalamis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jan Choinski winning 2 and Theo Papamalamis winning 0. The last match between Jan Choinski and Theo Papamalamis was at the Troyes Challenger, 30-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Jan Choinski getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Choinski | 1 |
| Papamalamis | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Troyes Challenger(06-30-25)
J. Choinski vs T. Papamalamis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $291,405 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.21% (418-288) | Career Total W/L | 51.16% (44-42) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 18 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Choinski vs T. Papamalamis Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Choinski has shown a slight edge in second serve points, winning 46.94% compared to Papamalamis's 46.07%. Could this small difference influence the match outcome? It might.
- When it comes to returning the second serve, both players are almost even, with Papamalamis capturing a marginally higher percentage at 42.91% compared to Choinski's 42.81%.
- Papamalamis has a significant advantage in returning first serves, with a 30.67% success rate compared to Choinski's 26.2%. Does this make Papamalamis a returning game favorite? Possibly.
- Choinski is slightly better at saving breakpoints, defending 56.28% against Papamalamis's 54.55%. Could this prove decisive under pressure? It could.
- In match victories over the past year, Papamalamis leads with a winning rate of 59.09% compared to Choinski's 50.85%.
- Both players excel on clay, but Choinski slightly edges out with a 62% win rate versus Papamalamis's 59%. Does the surface play suggest an advantage? Yes, perhaps for Choinski.
- Choinski has participated in higher-level tournaments, facing opponents with an average rank of 251.36, while Papamalamis's competitors average a rank of 324.52. Will this difference impact their on-court readiness? Likely.
- In deciding sets, Papamalamis has a higher win rate of 60%, compared to Choinski's 57%. Could this proficiency in the final set shape the outcome if it goes the distance? Potentially.
- Choinski is more efficient at converting break points at 37.5% compared to Papamalamis’s 34.82%. Might this be crucial for a clutch victory? Perhaps.
Editorial Prediction (June 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent statistics of both players, Choinski demonstrates a consistent service performance that slightly edges out Papamalamis. The ability to save breakpoints better reflects Choinski's composure under pressure.
Papamalamis, however, shows a stronger ability to return the first serve, which could prove pivotal if Choinski's serve falters during high-pressure moments. Additionally, Papamalamis holds an advantage in deciding sets, showcasing resilience in crucial match stages.
Choinski's experience competing against higher-ranked opponents and superior surface record on clay might bolster his chances in this matchup.
However, based on the overall statistics and recent trends, Papamalamis has demonstrated a marginally higher winning rate over the past year, which could solidify his odds of victory in this encounter. Therefore, Papamalamis is favored to win this upcoming match.
Jan Choinski vs Theo Papamalamis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Choinski vs T. Papamalamis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:16:26 | Average Match Time | 2:16:26 |
| 61% (54/88) | 1st Serve % | 46% (38/82) |
| 61% (33/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (26/38) |
| 68% (23/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (21/44) |
| 20% (2/10) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 43% (35/82) | Return Points Win % | 36% (32/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Choinski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 5-2 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
T. Papamalamis Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 3-6 4-1 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 7-6(2) | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||

J. Choinski vs T. Papamalamis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.21% (418/288) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.16% (44/42) |
| 57.07% (936/704) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.58% (98/92) |
| 52.98% (8128/7214) | Games Win/Loss | 50.70% (906/881) |
| 53.10% (60/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 63.14% (245/143) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 58.79% (107/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 26.09% (6/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1983 | Aces Total | 238 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 997 | Total Double Faults | 146 |
| 1:22:9 | Average Match Time | 1:51:26 |
| 480.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.66 |
| 65% (26539/40684) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3366/5826) |
| 68% (18022/26539) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2220/3366) |
| 52% (7303/14145) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1226/2460) |
| 44% (1795/4112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (253/600) |
| 40% (16420/40767) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2331/5689) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 38.71% (12/19) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 55.24% (174/141) | Challenger W/L | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 66.57% (225/113) | Futures W/L | 55.22% (37/30) |
| 59% (405/685) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (41/81) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (103/200) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (11/25) |
| 54% (122/225) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (10/23) |
| 88% (396/350) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (47/38) |
| 12% (396/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (47/7) |
| 22% (309/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (39/6) |